Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8190 (JHR)

MOHIT RAJ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./201/2026 · 2026-01-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:1284 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 201 of 2026 1. Mohit Raj, aged about 19 years, son of Manoj Kumar Yadav 2. Manoj Kumar Yadav, aged about 42 years, son of Ram Nagina Singh Both residents of 28 New Colony Jagarnathpur, Dhurwa, P.O. Dhurwa and P.S. Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Suraj Kishore Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P 03/ 19.01.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhurwa P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025, registered under sections 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352, 61 of the BNS, pending in the Court of learned C.J.M at Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is aged about 19 years and he is a student and he has recently passed 12th examination. He further submits that petitioner no.2 is the father of petitioner no.1 and there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners. He also submits that there are case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that although in the impugned order it has come that injury is grievous however that injury has been caused due to assault made by one Saurav Yadav by rod. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there. 5. Looking into contents of F.I.R, it transpires that allegation of assault by rod is against one Saurav Yadav and so far these petitioners are ( 2026:JHHC:1284 ) concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations and further there are case and counter case between the parties. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M at Ranchi, in connection with Dhurwa P.S. Case No. 304 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.19.01.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-