Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8186 (BOM)

DADASO ANANTO JAGDALE AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/4295/2026 · 2026-09-11

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11.WP.4295.2026.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4295 OF 2026 Dadaso Ananta Jagdale and Anr. .. Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. .. Respondents ....................  Mr. Sachin Thorat a/w. Mr. Yogesh G. Thorat, Advocates for Petitioners.  Ms. Anuja S. Rao, APP for Respondent – State. ......…........... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 11, 2026. P.C.: 1. Heard Mr. Thorat, learned Advocate for Petitioners and Ms. Rao, learned APP for Respondent – State. 2. After I expressed my disinclination to consider and allow the present Petition to Mr. Thorat, he persuaded me to allow him to take appropriate instructions from the Petitioners. He took instructions on telephone and has re-mentioned the matter. He persuaded the Court to allow the Petitioners to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to approach the Court later in accordance with law. That leave and liberty if so available to Petitioners in accordance with law is granted. 3. In view of the above, Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay 1 of 1 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Digitally signed by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.09.12 15:47:35 +0530