Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 81846 (MAD)

K. SHANMUGASUDARAM v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/2/2026 · 2026-01-08

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 2 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 2 of 2026 1. K. Shanmugasudaram Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Office Of District Collector, Erode District 638011 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer (Erode Division) Office Of District Collector Erode District 638011. 3.The Thasildar Kodumudi Taluk Kodumudi 638011. Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the respondents 2 and 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.09.2024 and pass. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.S. Kesavan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For Respondent ORDER This writ petition has been filed, seeking for a mandamus to direct the second and third respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 16.09.2024 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2 of 2026 2. The petitioner claims that in the Chitta and the “A” Register for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, which according to the petitioner is owned by him, the total extent of the property has been wrongly mentioned. The petitioner seeks for correction of the same through his representation dated 16.09.2024. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation dated 16.09.2024, seeking for correction of the extent of the land in the Chitta and “A” Register for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition is considered on merits and in accordance with law by the second respondent, who is the competent authority within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation dated 16.09.2024. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2 of 2026 representation dated 16.09.2024, seeking for correction of Chitta and “A” Register as well as the Revenue Records pertaining to the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, which the petitioner claims to be the owner, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 08-01-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector Office Of District Collector, Erode District 638011 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer (Erode Division) Office Of District Collector Erode District 638011. 3.The Thasildar Kodumudi Taluk Kodumudi 638011. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 2 of 2026 08-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis