MOHD AMIN v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
HCP/28/2026 · 2026-04-24
Rahul Bharti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 818 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 818 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
HCP No. 28/2026 CM No. 2450/2026
Mohd. Amin …..Petitioner
Through: Mr. Jyoti Sarup, Advocate.
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (24.04.2026)
01.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, when pointed out that how in absence of civil and police administration of district Udhampur being made as party-respondents through their respective heads, the writ petition can be maintained by the petitioner for seeking a writ of habeas corpus for production of Mst. Fatima along with four children, namely, Amir Khan (son), Amiza (daughter), Ayisha Amin (daughter) and Bisma (daughter), who are said to be held up in Holding Center Hiranagar, Kathua, but before that are said to have been picked up by the Police and Civil Administration of district Udhampur purportedly reckoning them as 8Rohingyas9, the learned counsel Serial No. 81 Supplementary List-I
2
HCP No. 28/2026 CM No. 2450/2026
for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh with the Deputy Commissioner (District Magistrate), Udhampur and the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Udhampur being made as party-respondents.
02. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
24.04.2026
Bunty
Bunty Kumar 2026.04.27 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document