Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 818 (JK)

MOHD AMIN v. UT OF J AND K TH. COMMISSIONER SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS

HCP/28/2026 · 2026-04-24

Rahul Bharti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU HCP No. 28/2026 CM No. 2450/2026 Mohd. Amin …..Petitioner Through: Mr. Jyoti Sarup, Advocate. Vs UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondents Through: CORAM: HON9BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (24.04.2026) 01. Learned counsel for the petitioner, when pointed out that how in absence of civil and police administration of district Udhampur being made as party-respondents through their respective heads, the writ petition can be maintained by the petitioner for seeking a writ of habeas corpus for production of Mst. Fatima along with four children, namely, Amir Khan (son), Amiza (daughter), Ayisha Amin (daughter) and Bisma (daughter), who are said to be held up in Holding Center Hiranagar, Kathua, but before that are said to have been picked up by the Police and Civil Administration of district Udhampur purportedly reckoning them as 8Rohingyas9, the learned counsel Serial No. 81 Supplementary List-I 2 HCP No. 28/2026 CM No. 2450/2026 for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file a fresh with the Deputy Commissioner (District Magistrate), Udhampur and the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Udhampur being made as party-respondents. 02. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 24.04.2026 Bunty Bunty Kumar 2026.04.27 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document