RAJENDAR HEMBROM @ RAJENDRA HEMBROM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./12137/2025 · 2026-03-16
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 818 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 818 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:7108] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 12137 of 2025
Rajendar Hembrom @ Rajendra Hembrom, aged about 47 years, S/o Late Renso Hembrom, R/o village- Chota Raykaman, Andhari, P.O.- Andhari, P.S.- Kumardungi, Dist.- West Singhbhum, Jharkhand
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhav Prasad , Adv. For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, Addl. PP
03 / 16.03.2026 Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kumardungi P. S. case no. 12 of 2024, corresponding G.R. case no. 303 of 2024 arising out of S.T. case no. 367 of 2024 instituted under Section 103(1) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed murder of Sukhdeo Pinghua while he was attempting to rape upon the co-accused Jaysri Pingua. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and there is no eye witness to the occurrence and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner in this case. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 4 of the bail application and he has been implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and confessional statement of the co-accused persons. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 19.07.2024, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is then submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of
the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in connection with Kumardungi P. S. case no. 12 of 2024, corresponding G.R. case no. 303 of 2024 arising out of S.T. case no. 367 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co- operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 16.03.2026
Smita/-