Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8176 (UTT)

CANARA BANK v. M/S AGARWAL AUTO TRADERS

WPMB/566/2026 · 2026-07-16

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010118332026 2026:UHC:5897-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY July 16, 2026 Writ Petition (M/B) No.566 of 2026 Canara Bank ----Petitioner Versus M/s Agarwal Auto Traders & Others ----Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Ashish Joshi and Mr. Shobhit Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner JUDGMENT : (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta, C. J.) 1. Mr. Ashish Joshi and Mr. Shobhit Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner state that the dispute in the present matter is covered by the order passed today in WPMB No.565 of 2026. 2. The operative part of the order passed in the said case is as follows:- “9. As the petitioner has raised a specific objection regarding non-compliance of the provisions of Section 30A of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 and therefore, we dispose of the instant petition with direction to the DRT to decide the said issue expeditiously and preferably on the next date, and until the same is decided, it shall not proceed to pass any orders on merits.” 1 UKHC010118332026 2026:UHC:5897-DB 3. The instant writ petition, therefore, also disposed of in the same terms. (MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 16.07.2026 Rajni 2