AJAY RAM ALIAS AJAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./583/2026 · 2026-02-03
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8175 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8175 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:2827 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ABA No.583 of 2026
1. Ajay Ram @ Ajay Kumar, aged about 46 years, son of Late Chitan Ram
2. Charku Ram, aged about 52 years, son of Late Chitan Ram
3. Baleshwar Ram @ Baleshwars Ram, aged about 55 years, son of Late Chitan Ram
4. Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Ravi, aged about 47 years, son of Baleshwar Ram All are residents of Hurli Barkagaon, P.O. & P.S. Barkagaon, Dist. Hazaribag
…. Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
--------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mrs. Kumari Rashmi, A.P.P. ------
2/03.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners and
learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 235 of 2019, registered for the offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 325, 379, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and cognizance taken u/s 341, 323, 325, 504, 307/34 IPC, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and the informant are on inimical terms and the entire family members have been made accused and the allegations are made that while the informant was returning along with his son, these petitioners have assaulted. He next submits that police investigated the matter and final form has been submitted against the bailable sections and pursuant to the order in revision, further section
2026:JHHC:2827 2
307 of IPC has been added in the case.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the allegations are there of assault.
5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it appears that there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners of assault and it is not clear that pursuant to whose blow, such injury has been received and pursuant to the order in the revision by the learned Sessions Judge, Section 307 of IPC has been added, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the petitioners above named are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of their surrender / arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh, in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 235 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and
disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 03.02.2026 R.Kumar