[2026:RJ-JP:21625] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7914/2026 1. Manoj Kumar S/o Goruram Kulhari, R/o Kulhariyon Ki Dhani, Tan Singnaur, P.S. Gudha Gaurji, District Jhunjhunu. At Present Lodged In The District Jail, Jhunjhunu. 2. Sandeep S/o Shri Kishanaram, R/o Ward No. 04, Dhani Majhau, P.S. Gudha Gaurji, District Jhunjhunu. At Present Lodged In The District Jail, Jhunjhunu. ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 21/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 140/2025 registered at Police Station Mukandgarh, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 112(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and under Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 28.04.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that the main allegations are against the co-accused Subhash Chandra who has already been enlarged on bail by the Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.11.2025 in S.B. [2026:RJ-JP:21625] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7914/2026] Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13807/2025; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners is proposed to be filed; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioners hereinabove. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 28.04.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that the main allegations are against the co-accused Subhash Chandra who has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.11.2025 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13807/2025; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Manoj Kumar S/o Goruram Kulhari and Sandeep S/o Shri Kishanaram are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court [2026:RJ-JP:21625] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7914/2026] and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 86/KAVISH