Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8170 (RAJ)

PAWAN S/O OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5106/2026 · 2026-06-01

Ashutosh Kumar V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:22798] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5106/2026 Pawan S/o Omprakash, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Dhanoli, P.s. Surwal, District Sawai Madhopur (Confined In Sawai Madhopur Jail). ----Accused/Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Hemand Kankoriya, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, Addl.G.A. Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, Dy.G.A. Mr. Amit Gupta, Addl.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR (VACATION JUDGE) Order 01/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 12.03.2026 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur in Bail Application No.192/2026 arising out of FIR No.27/2026, registered at Police Station Soorwal, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 112(2) and 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66-D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that the accused-applicant is an [2026:RJ-JP:22798] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5106/2026] innocent boy aged about 19 years, whose bank account has been used by the other persons for committing cyber fraud. Learned counsel argues that as per the present FIR, complaints against the bank account of the present accused-applicant have been found to be registered, in which an amount of about Rs.3,00,000/- has been deposited. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant contends that the accused-applicant was arrested on 30.01.2026 and since then, he is behind the bars. Learned counsel further contends that the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, he prays that the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State vehemently oppose this bail application and submit that the offences with regard to cyber crimes are rising at an alarming rate, therefore, the accused-applicant is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the age and period of custody of the accused-applicant; the fact that no other criminal case has been registered against the accused-applicant and also, charge-sheet has already been filed and the trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused-applicant. [2026:RJ-JP:22798] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5106/2026] 7. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Pawan S/o Omprakash, arrested in FIR No.27/2026, registered at Police Station Soorwal, District Sawai Madhopur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The accused-applicant is also directed to mark his presence in third week of every month till conclusion of trial, before the concerned Police Station. SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-applicant to learned trial Court every month. In case of any breach of the above condition, learned counsel for the State shall be free to move an application against the accused-applicant for cancellation of bail before the concerned Judicial Magistrate. 9. Copy of this order also be sent to concerned SHO for compliance. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),V.J. AARZOO ARORA/43