IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.9 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.01.2026 __________________________________________________________________ Sant Ram Sharma and Another ……...Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Ms. Mamta Garg, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for State. __________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record copy of office order dated 03.11.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, has been complied with, subject to final outcome of LPA filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh in Mohit Sharma’s case. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid document, which is taken on record, there appears to be merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General. 2 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly the same is disposed of, with the direction to respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from aforesaid compliance, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two months. January 06, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge