Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:6149
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 347 of 2026 Vasu Choubey S/o Late Sanjay Choubey Aged About 26 Years R/o 27 Kholi, Vikas Nagar, Near Ex. Mla Manharanlal Pandey's House Bilaspur 495001, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner. Versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank Through The Regional Manager, Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank, Regional Office, Dss Colony, Bilaspur, 495001, C.G. 2 - The Branch Manager Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank, Sakri Branch, Sakri 495003, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents. For Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar Bajpai, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. P. R. Patankar, Advocate. (Hon’ble Shri Justice
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
) Order on Board
04/02/2026
1. This writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:-
"10.1 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to accept the Writ Petition and pleased to decide the Petitioner's grievance. 10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass an order directing the Respondent No. 2 (Sakri Branch of Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank) to release the entire Amount Standing in the SB Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.02.04 16:31:43 +0530
2 Account No. 5421042276 of Smt. Love Kumari Choubey (Petitioner's Mother) to the Petitioner on the basis of Succession Certificate (Annexure P-1) and Death Certificate of Petitioner's younger Sister (Annexure P-2). 10.3 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass an Order directing the Respondent No. 2 to consider the Petitioner's Representation dated 18.11.2025 (Annexure P-3) at the earliest. 10.4 Any other Order or Directions deem fit and proper may also be passed in the facts and situation of the case and in the interest of justice."
2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents stated no objection to the above submission.
4. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, this case is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay