Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8168 (HP)

PARIYOJNA PRABHAVIT KALYAN SAMITI SHAKHA FIRLIOALE v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/7797/2026 · 2026-05-19

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7797 of 2026 Decided on: 19.05.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pariyojna Prabhavit Kalyan Samiti Shakha Firlioale …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. T.K.Verma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice is confined to respondents No.1 to 3, which is waived by Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner had preferred a representation to respondent No.2 on 18.12.2025 (Annexure P-9) seeking rehabilitation of adversely affected people from the project constructed by respondent No.4 and also seeking grant of 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 compensation/relief to the projected affected families. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid representation has still not been considered by the Competent Authority. He further submitted that petitioner would be satisfied in case respondent No.2/Competent Authority is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 3. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/ Competent Authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua May 19, 2026 Judge R.Atal