Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8168 (GAU)

TRISHNA RANI BAISHYA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS

WP(C)/2580/2026 · 2026-06-14

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010095602026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2580/2026 TRISHNA RANI BAISHYA W/O SRI ARUN CH RABHA, R/O VILL. BAPOI BALIGAON, P.O. RAKSHASMARI, P.S. DHEKIAJULI, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM 784507 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM PANJABARI GUWAHATI-781037. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER SONITPUR DISTRICT TEZPUR ASSAM-784001. 4:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BORSOLA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN-784149 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A GANGULY, MR. DHANANJAY TALUKDAR,MR. Page No.# 2/3 TAPOBRAT CHHETRI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 15.06. 2026 Heard Mr. A. Ganguly learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. K. Ghosh, learned Standing Counsel appears for the P&RD. Mr. D. Borah, learned counsel appears for Respondent No. 3. 2. The writ petitioner was aggrieved by the transfer order dated 13.03.2026, whereby the petitioner was transferred from Borsola Development Block, Sonitpur to Bechimari Development Block, Darrang. Being aggrieved, she has approached this Court. 3. The matter was last listed on 29.05.2026, whereby the respondents were permitted to obtain their instructions. 4. Today, when the matter is called up, Mr. A. K. Ghosh, learned Standing Counsel has placed before the Court a communication dated 09.06.2026, whereby the transfer order of the writ petitioner along with the three other persons have been modified. 5. By the said transfer and posting order in respect of the writ petitioner is stayed and the petitioner was permitted to continue to serve at her earlier place Page No.# 3/3 of posting i.e. Borsola Development Block, Sonitpur. 6. Since, this earlier transfer order which was assailed in the writ petition stood modified. 7. No further cost survives in the writ petition. 8. Copy of the said communication dated 09.06.2026, is kept in the case record. 9. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed. 10. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 11. Pending I.As, if any, are also dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant