Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8166 (ALL)

VIJAY YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/4770/2026 · 2026-09-17

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4770 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Heard Shri Chandra Bhushan Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Chhavi Pal Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused material on record. The present application under Section 529 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to issue a direction to Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Gorakhpur to decide Complaint Case No. 118885 of 2021, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Gorakhpur within stipulated period. Considering the fact that the case is pending since 2021, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this application is finally disposed of with a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 2, Gorakhpur to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months, after production of certified copy of the order, without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. With the aforesaid directions, the application stands disposed of finally. September 18, 2026 T. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Bhushan Yadav, Geeta Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Vijay Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad