WP No. 50524 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 50524 of 2025 1. V. Muralikrishnan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Tiruvannamali, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The District Revenue Officer Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 4.The Tahsildar Chetpet Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District 5.R. Hari Kumar Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 1st, 3rd and 4th respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representations dated 21.11.2025, with regard to remove the wrong entry of the petitioners land as natham kali (vacant) land in the revenue records in connection with S.No.317 extent 825 sq,ft situated at Kannanur Pazhampettai, Chetpet Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, within a time to be stipulated by this Court For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Chandrasekaran For Respondent(s): Mr.R.P.Murugan Raja Govt Advocate For R1 To R4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50524 of 2025 R5- Notice dispensed with ORDER This writ petition has been filed to remove the wrong entry of the petitioner’s land as “Natham Kali (vacant) land” in the revenue records for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition based on the petitioner’s representation dated 21.11.2025 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner claims that he is the owner of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. He claims that the respondents have wrongly classified the property as “Natham Kali (vacant) land” instead of “punja land”. The petitioner has filed supporting documents along with the representation dated 21.11.2025 to the respondents. Since the said representation has not been considered, till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr. R.P.Murugan Raja, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, seeking for removal of alleged wrong entry as “Natham Kali https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50524 of 2025 (vacant) land” instead of “punja land” is considered on merits and in accordance with law after hearing the objections of the fifth respondent as well as any other third party whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation dated 21.11.2025. 6. Since no adverse orders are passed against the fifth respondent, notice to the fifth respondent is dispensed with by this Court. 7. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the first respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 21.11.2025, seeking for removal of alleged wrong entry in the petitioner’s land as “Natham Kali (vacant) land” instead of “punja land” for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order after hearing the objections of the fifth respondent as well as any other third party whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire. 8. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 12-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50524 of 2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector Tiruvannamali, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The District Revenue Officer Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Cheyyar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. 4.The Tahsildar Chetpet Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50524 of 2025 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 50524 of 2025 12-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis