HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36875 of 2026 Court No. - 38 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J. 1. Heard counsel for the petitioners, and learned Standing Counsel representing the State-respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been preferred for issuance of a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 2, Board of Revenue, Prayagraj to decide Case No. REV/2870 of 2018 titled M/s Baboo Lal Anil Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Others, within stipulated time. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aforesaid case has been pending consideration before respondent no.2, but no final decision has been made thereon till date. Therefore, a suitable direction be issued to respondent no.2 to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously, within a stipulated time. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the present writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 2, the Board of Revenue, Prayagraj, that upon the petitioner depositing 1/3rd of the deficient stamp duty, Case No. REV/2870 of 2018 (M/s Baboo Lal Anil Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Others) shall be decided expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. September 15, 2026 Shafique Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vinod Diwakar,J.) M/S Baboo Lal Anil Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad