1 / 3 2026:CGHC:15230 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2948 of 2026 Chinta Ram Patel S/o Late Paras Ram Patel Aged About 64 Years R/o Ward No.- 5, Upar Para, Chikhlakasa, Village And Post- Chikhlakasa, Tahsil- Doundi And District- Balod (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Atal Nagar Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribes, Development Department, Atal Nagar Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Raipur, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - District Education Officer Balod, District- Balod (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate For State : Mr. Hari Om Rai, P.L. S.B.: HON'BLE SHRI PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, JUDGE ORDER ON BOARD 02.04.2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent concerned to examine case of the petitioner and grant benefits of third Time Bound Pay Scale to the petitioner in light of circular issued by the State Govt. 2 / 3 from time to time and granted similar benefit to similar employee (Patwari), within a reasonable time, as this Court deems fit. 10.2 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is working as Patwari and has completed 30 years of service. According to the circular issued by the State Government, petitioner is entitled for time pay scale after completion of 10 years of service, 20 years of service and 30 years of service. Petitioner has been granted two time pay scale after completion of 10 years and 20 years of service, however, third time scale pay after completion of 30 years of service has not been granted. He submits that similar issue was considered and decided in case of R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors in WPS No.2805 of 2002 decided on 29.08.2006. He further submits that petitioner may be granted liberty to make a fresh representation for consideration of his case in light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in case of State of Tripura & Ors Vs. K.K. Roy, reported in 2004 AIR SCW 1 and R.S. Verma (supra). 3. Learned counsel for State submits that she may be granted time to seek instruction in the matter. 4. Considering the nature of grievance raised, in particular the grievance of petitioner that petitioner has completed 30 years of service and according to circular issued by the State Government dated 08.08.2018 and 11.06.2019, he is entitled for third time scale pay, which is not granted and further considering the decision in case of R.S. Verma (supra) and K.K. Roy (supra), this writ petition at this stage is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation along with all 3 / 3 supporting documents before respondent No.2 and in the event, petitioner submits such representation, the concerned authority shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) JUDGE Saurabh