Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8157 (AP)

Soma Hima, v. The Panchayath Secretary,

CRP/1573/2026 · 2026-08-11

Subba Reddy Satti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : 30.07.2026 Date of pronouncement : 12.08.2026 Date of uploading : .08.2026 APHC010263662026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1573/2026 Between: 1. SOMA HIMA,, W/O. BHASKAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. RAMAMANDHIRAM STREET, PODALAKURU V AND P, PODALAKURU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, PODALAKUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, PODALAKUR VAM SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 2. THE MANDAL PRAJAPARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PODALAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAYAT OFFICER, NEAR ZP OFFICE, PODALAKUR ROAD, NELLORE ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to direct the Hon'ble Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudur to dispose of the above suit OS No. 87/2022 as early as possible in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri T. Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The sole plaintiff in the suit O.S.No.87 of 2022 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Gudur, filed the above Civil Revision Petition (hereinafter referred to as ‘the revision’) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the trial court to dispose of the suit expeditiously. 3. The petitioner/plaintiff filed suit O.S.No.87 of 2022 against respondents 1 to 3 / defendants 1 to 3, seeking declaration of title and consequential relief of permanent injunction, restraining the defendants, their men, etc., from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the suit was filed in the year 2022. The chief affidavit of PW1 was filed on 12.08.2025. Since then, there is no progress in the suit. 5. Considering the relief sought in the revision, this Court has called for information from the trial court regarding the stage of the suit. Accordingly, this Court received the proceeding sheet through WhatsApp, and a copy of the same is placed before this Court. 6. A perusal of the proceeding sheet discloses that after filing of affidavit in lieu of chief-examination of P.W.1, third parties filed I.A.No.612 of 2025 under Order I Rule 3 C.P.C. to permit them to come on record as defendants 4 and 5. The said application was allowed on 16.12.2025. Thereafter, the suit was adjourned for filing of neat copy of the plaint, and the same was filed on 20.01.2026. Thereafter, the suit underwent several adjournments for filing of additional written statements by defendants 1 to 3 and written statement by defendants 4 and 5. On 20.07.2026, the trial court recorded that no additional issues are required to be framed and adjourned the matter to 04.08.2026 for arguments. 7. Given the above facts and circumstances of the case, as the suit is at the stage of arguments, the trial court shall expedite hearing and dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible, keeping in view the circular issued by this Court vide R.O.C.No.560/OP/CELL/ 2022, dated 23.11.2022. 8. With the above direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 12.08.2026 IKN Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No