OSIDUR ISLAM ALIAS OSHIDUR AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
AB/822/2026 · 2026-06-14
Parthivjyoti Saikia
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8155 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8155 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010076242026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/822/2026 OSIDUR ISLAM ALIAS OSHIDUR AND ANR S/O KABEJ UDDIN SK , R/O 500 KHOPATI PART II, VILL. TAKIMARI, HAZIRHAT, P.O. HAZIRHAT, SUKCHAR, SUB DIST. SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 783128 2: PRIYAT JAMAN ALIAS PERIOT ZAMAL SK.
SON OF KABEJ UDDIN SK. RESIDENT OF 50 KHOPATI PART-II VILL- TAKIMARI HAZIRHAT P.O. HAZIRHAT SUKCHAR SUB-DISTRICT- SOUTH SALMARA MANKACHAR ASSAM PIN-783128 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MR. MEHUL SHAH,MS. K L R YANTHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MRS. S KHATANIAR(INFORMANT),MR. B B GOGOI(INFORMANT)
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 15.06.2026
Heard Mr. S C Biswas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam and Mr. B B Gogoi, learned counsel representing the respondent no. 2. By this application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, the petitioners, namely, (1) Osidur Islam @ Oshidur and (2) Priyat Jaman @ Periot Zamal Sk, have prayed for pre-arrest bail in connection with Sukchar P.S. Case No. 20/2026. Mr. Goswami has submitted that a group of 14 (fourteen) persons had assaulted two persons for which one person had died. The present 2 (two) petitioners have taken active part in killing the deceased. It may be stated that on 24.04.2026, this Court granted interim bail to the present petitioners and pursuant to the said order, they have appeared before the Investigating Officer and have been cooperating in the Police investigation. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides. This court is of the opinion that since the petitioners have appeared before the Investigating Officer and cooperating in the investigation, they do not deserve to be detained in custody. Hence, the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners is allowed. Accordingly, the interim order dated 24.04.2026 is made absolute. The bail application is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant