Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 81507 (MAD)

D.BHUVANESHWARI v. The Superintend of Police

WP Crl./1779/2025 · 2026-01-12

A D Jagadish Chandira

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 1779 of 2025 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA WP Crl. No. 1779 of 2025 D.Bhuvaneshwari ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of District Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai. 3. The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Thiruvannamalai. 4. Aathitya Palaniswamy ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition (Crl.) has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct a fair and proper investigation and to take necessary action against 4th respondent in accordance with law. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.A.K.Rajaraman For Respondent(s) : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 to R3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1779 of 2025 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This writ petition (Crl.) has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to conduct a fair and proper investigation and to take necessary action, against the fourth respondent in accordance with law. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 submitted that based on the complaint dated 26.08.2025 given by the petitioner's husband against the fourth respondent, an enquiry was conducted by the third respondent in C.S.R.No.1020 of 2025. However, the complaint has now been closed, as the dispute between the parties was found to be civil in nature. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 to 3, this writ petition (Crl.) is closed with a direction to the respondents police to serve the closure report on the petitioner. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the closure report in the manner known to law, if so advised. No costs. 12-01-2026 rap Neutral Citation: Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1779 of 2025 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of District Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai District. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvannamalai. 3. The Inspector of Police, West Police Station, Thiruvannamalai. 4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 1779 of 2025 __________ Page4 of 4 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. RAP WP Crl. No. 1779 of 2025 12-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis