Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8148 (KAR)

SMT. LAKSHMI NARASAMMA v. M.R. MANJUNATH

MFA/2595/2020 · 2026-02-11

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8273 MFA No. 2595 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.2595 OF 2020 (CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. LAKSHMI NARASAMMA WIFE OF LATE L KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS NO.15, NEAR SJES COLLEGE VIRGONAGAR POST, MEDAHALLI VILLAGE, BENGALURU-560049. NOW RESIDING AT NO.354/1, SRK NAGAR POST, NEAR SVN BRANCH SCHOOL, THANISANDRA, BENGALURU-560077 …APPELLANT (BY SMT. UDITA RAMESH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M.R. MANJUNATH SON OF LATE N RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, NO.158 MEDAHALLI VILLAGE, BENGALURU-560049. 2. M SRINIVASA SON OF LATE B R MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, NO.25, SRI VINAYAKA LAYOUT, NEAR DEEPA HOSPITAL, K R PURAM EXTENSION, K R PURAM, BENGALURU-560036. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8273 MFA No. 2595 of 2020 3. SMT MANJULA @ MANJULADEVI WIFE OF LATE C N SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, NO.1 LAKSHMI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA 1ST CROSS, KTB LAYOUT, K R PURAM, BENGALURU-560003. 4. HUMAYUN SAIT SON OF LATE HASIM SAIT AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, NO.1/3 NORTH ROAD, COOK TOWN, BENGALURU-560084. 5. M/S DHANSRI ESTATES PVT LTD NO.6 CUNNINGHARM ROAD BENGALURU-560052 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR PRATAP THUMBOCHETTY 6. M/S PIONEER DEVELOPERS PARTNERSHIP FIRM NO.240, 2ND FLOOR, 32ND CROSS, 7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560082. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR Y HANUMANTH REDDY …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8273 MFA No. 2595 of 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT Smt.Udita Ramesh, counsel for the appellant appeared in person and submits that a memo has been filed stating that the appeal may be dismissed as having become infructuous. 2. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about the submission as the appeal having become infructuous. 3. Memo is placed on record. 4. Resultantnly, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16