Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 81477 (MAD)

RAMESH v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/50506/2025 · 2026-01-12

V Lakshminarayanan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 50506 of 2025 p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 50506 of 2025 Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Namakkal District Namakkal. 2. The Assistant Director (panchayat) Namakkal District, Namakkal. 3. The Tahsildar Rasipuram Taluk Namakkal District. 4. The Block Development Officer Vennandur Block, Namakkal District. 5. The Special Officer Cum Executive Officer Palanthinnipatti Village Panchayat Namakkal District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, forbear the respondents from carrying out construction of public toilet obstructing in the 20 feet common pathway comprised in survey No. 65/2A1A situated at Palanthinnipatti Village, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Subash For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Venkata Seshaya, GA, R4 & R5 Mr.M.Shajahan, SGP, R1 to R3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50506 of 2025 p. 2 O R D E R The petitioner is the owner of a portion of the property situated in Survey No. 65A/2A1A. This property of 65/2A1A of Palanthinnipatti Patti, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. 2.According to the petitioner, the access to his property is through a 20 feet passage, which runs in front of his property. The cause of action for the writ petition is that the respondents 4 and 5 are constructing a public toilet in the said 20 feet passage. 3.When the matter came up for admission, Mr.M.Shajahan takes notice for 1st to 3rd respondents and Mr.V.Venkata Seshaya takes notice for 4th and 5th respondents. 4. Mr.M.Shajahan has been instructed to report that the toilet is not being constructed on the 20-feet road, but on the other side of the said 20 feet road, which is opposite to the petitioner’s property. Since the respondents 4 and 5 states that they are not constructing on the 20 feet road, the grievance of the petitioner does not arise. Suffice it to record the statement. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 12-01-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No Maya https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 50506 of 2025 p. 3 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Maya To 1. The District Collector Namakkal District Namakkal. 2. The Assistant Director (panchayat) Namakkal District, Namakkal. 3. The Tahsildar Rasipuram Taluk Namakkal District. 4. The Block Development Officer Vennandur Block, Namakkal District. 5. The Special Officer Cum Executive Officer Palanthinnipatti Village Panchayat Namakkal District. WP No. 50506 of 2025 12-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis