Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16679 WP No. 7274 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 7274 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
MUNDAMADA K AIYANNA S/O LATE KALAPPA M A, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
2.
VIDYA C.P.
W/O MUNDAMADA K AIYANNA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
3.
MUNDAMADA K PARVATI W/O LATE MUNDAMADA K KALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS,
ALL PETITIONERS R/AT CHINNAMMAS HOUSE, KAVERI HILLS, 6TH CROSS, GONIKOPPAL, PONNAMPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571213 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SACHIN B S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA GONIKOPPA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.
2.
SMT. MUNDAMADA P. DECCHAMMA W/O LATE M.K. PONNANNA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/AT ST. THOMAS ROAD,
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16679 WP No. 7274 of 2021
GONIKOPPAL, VIRAJPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571213. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHD. AYUB ALI, ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR RESPONDENT NO.1;
SRI. PRAVEEN S.L., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M.H.HANEEF, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.354/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (JN.DN.) AND JMFC, PONNAMPET REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 498A, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT AS PER ANNEXURE-A IN SO FAR AS PETITIONERS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners have challenged the prosecution launched against them in C.C No.354/2020 pending trial before the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Ponnampet for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
2. When this petition is listed for admission, Sri.S.L.Praveen, learned counsel appearing for Sri.M.H.Haneef,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16679 WP No. 7274 of 2021
learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that the parties have settled their disputes amicably.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a suit in O.S No.15/2023 was filed by the daughter of respondent No.2 for partition and separate possession of her share in the suit properties and that the parties have settled the said suit in terms of which, respondent No.2 has agreed to withdraw all cases pending before all Courts including C.C No.354/2020.
4. In this regard, the learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo along with the related documents The memo and the documents are taken on record.
5. A perusal of the above documents would indicate that the respondent No.2 has specifically agreed in O.S No.15/2023 that she would withdraw C.C No.354/2020 and Cr.M.C No.136/2022, registered by the respondent No.1.
6. In that view of the matter, the petition is allowed. The prosecution launched against the petitioners in C.C No.354/2020 pending trial before the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) and JMFC, Ponnampet registered for offences punishable under
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16679 WP No. 7274 of 2021
Sections 498A, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 is quashed.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
UN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46