Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : -- Date of pronouncement : 05.08.2026 Date of uploading : 05.08.2026 APHC010564352025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 5th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3307/2025 Between:
1. K. PRADEEP REDDY, S/O K.SUBBAREDDY, AGED 41 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.8-29, TADEPALLI URBAN, TADEPALLIMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PIN-522501. DESIGNATION. RESERVE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, INTELLIGENCE DEPT, VIJAYAWADA.
...PETITIONER AND
1. HARISH KUMAR GUPTA IPS, THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI S HARIKRISHNA IPS, THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE(PERSONNEL), O/O. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
2
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to punish the respondents herein for violating the Order made by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.19091/2025, dt.07.08.2025 (by The Hon'ble SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY), under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act and also under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, for willful disobedience, in the interest of Justice and pass such other orders. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. A JAYANTHI The Court made the following:
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No/Non-Reportable Yes/No
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE No.3307 of 2025
ORDER:
1. The present Contempt Case is filed for non-compliance of the
Order dated 07.08.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.19091 of 2025, wherein this Court directed the Respondents to reconsider the case of the Petitioner in terms of the Division Bench Judgment of this Court in W.P.No.36252 of 2018 and pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible. Pursuant thereto, Respondent No.1 passed a Speaking Order vide Memo in Rc.No.175/E2/2025, dated 30.04.2026.
2. Though the counsel for the Petitioner submitted his arguments regarding the correctness of the Speaking Order passed by Respondent No.1, this Court considering the scope of the Contempt Case, is not inclined to go into the correctness of the Speaking
Order.
3. In the light of passing of Speaking Order by Respondent No.1, the Contempt Case is closed. The Petitioner is at liberty to seek for challenging the Speaking Order in an independent Writ Petition.
4
4. No order as to costs.
5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
Date: 05.08.2026
IS
5
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CONTEMPT CASE No.3307 of 2025 Date: 05.08.2026
IS