Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8143 (UTT)

RAHUL AHLUWALIA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/698/2026 · 2026-07-17

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010062632026 WPCRL/698/2026 Rahul Ahluwalia And Another --Petitioners Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners (through V.C.). 2. Mr. Jai Prakash, A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. Aryan Dev Uniyal, Advocate for the complainant. 4. Learned State Counsel filed a counter- affidavit, which is taken on record. In counter- affidavit, it is mentioned that after investigation, closure report has been filed against all the petitioners. As such, nothing survives in the matter and the matter has become infructuous. 5. Since, closure report has been filed and the matter has become infructuous, the present writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mahra J.) 17.07.2026 Ujjwal