[2026:RJ-JP:21477] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6314/2026 Vinod Meena S/o Lalaram Meena, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Meena Krishi Farm, Jayrampur Road, Khorabisal, Jaipur Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 21/05/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 32/2025 registered at Police Station Khora Bisal, District Jaipur (West) for the offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the co-accused Rakesh has already been enlarged on regular bail by this Court on the basis of compromise entered between the complainant and the co-accused. The case of the petitioner is on better footing. The offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2026 and the trial of [2026:RJ-JP:21477] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6314/2026] the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Vinod Meena S/o Lalaram Meena, in connection with FIR No. 32/2025 registered at Police Station Khora Bisal, District Jaipur (West), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the [2026:RJ-JP:21477] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6314/2026] accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/36