Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:8748
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 495 of 2025
1. Dr. Ajay Kumar Pandey S/o Late R.C. Pandey Aged About 60 Years R/o House No. 23 Golden Homes Society, Vip Estate, Near Vip Club, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Veterinary Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur (C.G.)
2. The Under Secretary Veterinary Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur (C.G.)
3. The Director Directorate Of Health Services, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
4. The Deputy Director Veterinary Services, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
5. The Deputy Director Veterinary Services, Jashpur, District- Jashpur C.G.
... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Akansha Verma Dabhadker, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Digitally signed by SYED ROSHAN ZAMIR ALI Date: 2026.02.20 11:03:33 +0530
2 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 18/02/2026
1. Learned counsel for respondents submits that reply has been filed. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that she is not pressing this writ petition on merits and only seeking permission of this Court to submit representation before the Transfer Committee constituted under the Transfer Policy to consider grievance of employees against transfer, raising all the grounds as available to petitioner for challenging the impugned transfer order. 3. Learned State Counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and only seeking permission to submit representation before the Transfer Committee, he is having no objection. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner submits that pursuant to interim order passed by this Court in favour of petitioner, he is still working at his earlier place of posting; no other employee is posted in place of petitioner and therefore, till decision is taken on representation to be submitted by petitioner, some interim protection be granted. 5. Heard learned counsel for respective parties. 3
6. On due consideration of submission of learned counsel for respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit comprehensive representation before the Transfer Committee constituted under the Transfer Policy within ten days, raising all the grounds as raised in this writ petition.
If such a representation is submitted by petitioner, the Committee shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 7. Till the representation of petitioner is decided, status quo, as it exists today with respect to posting of petitioner, shall be maintained by the parties. 8. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge roshan/-