Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8131 (RAJ)

MAHESH RAHUL VERMA S/O GAJANAND VERMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6195/2026 · 2026-06-01

Ashutosh Kumar V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:22804] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6195/2026 Mahesh Rahul Verma S/o Gajanand Verma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Bonli, Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandewal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, Addl. GA Mr. Amit Gupta, Addl. GA Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, Dy. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR (VACATION JUDGE) Order 01/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 13.04.2026 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Cases (Prevention of Atrocity Cases), Sawai Madhopur, in connection with FIR No. 95/2026, registered at Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhpur, for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2) & 111(2)(b) of B.N.S., 2023, and 66-D of I.T.(Amendment) Act, 2008, by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this matter. [2026:RJ-JP:22804] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6195/2026] Learned counsel further submits that the offences levelled against the accused-applicant is that he received about Rs.3,00,000/- in his bank account by cyber fraud. Learned counsel contends that charge-sheet has already been filed against the accused-applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) & 319(2) of B.N.S., 2023, and 66-D of I.T.(Amendment) Act, 2008, and all the offences are triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel also contends that the accused-applicant was arrested on 28.03.2026 and since then, he is behind the bars. Learned counsel argues that there is no criminal antecedents against the applicant-accused. Learned counsel prays that trial will take long time to conclude, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the facts that the accused-applicant is behind the bars since 28.03.2026; that the offences levelled against the accused- applicant are triable by the Magistrate; there is no criminal antecedents against the applicant-accused; the charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused-applicant. 6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Mahesh Rahul Verma S/o Gajanand Verma, arrested in FIR [2026:RJ-JP:22804] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6195/2026] No. 95/2026, registered at Police Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhpur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The accused-applicant is also directed to mark his present in third week of every month till conclusion of trial, before the concerned Police Station. SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the present report of the accused-applicant to learned trial Court every month. In case of any breach of the above condition, learned counsel for the State shall be free to move an application against the accused-applicant for cancellation of bail before the concerned Judicial Magistrate. 8. Copy of this order also be sent to the concerned SHO for compliance. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),V.J. 53/SHIVAM/RACHNA