Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8131 (AP)

SHAIK GURAZALA KASIM, GUNTUR DT., v. SHAIK GURAZALA BEE JOHNBEE, GUNTUR & ANR, REP PP.,

CRLRC/644/2015 · 2026-08-06

Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : - Date of pronouncement :07.08.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010655282015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE 7th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 644 OF 2015 AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE (SR) No.13266 OF 2015 CRL.R.C. NO: 644 OF 2015 Between: Shaik Gurazala Kasim, S/o.Ameeana Saheb, Aged about 56 years, Cultivation, R/o Janapadu Village, Piduguralla Mandal, Guntur district. ...Petitioner AND 1. Shaik Gurazala bee Johnbee, W/o.Kasim Saheb, Aged about 51 years, House wife, R/o.Janapadu Village, Piduguralla mandal, Guntur District. 2.The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court Judicature at Hyderabad. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) CRIMINAL REVISION CASE (SR) No: 13266/2015 Between: Shaik Gurazala Kasim, S/o.Ameeana Saheb, Aged about 56 years, Cultivation, R/o.Janapadu Village, Piduguralla Mandal, Guntur district. ...Petitioner AND 1. Shaik Gurazala bee Johnbee, W/o.Kasim Saheb, Aged about 51 years, House wife, R/o.Janapadu Village, Piduguralla mandal, Guntur District. 2.The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court Judicature at Hyderabad. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 644 OF 2015 AND CRIMINAL REVISION CASE (SR) No.13266 OF 2015 COMMON ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the revision petitioner and respondent No.1. 2. Both the counsel submitted that both parties amicably settled the matter out of Court and there are no other disputes between them, as such these cases may be dismissed. 3. Recorded the said submission. 4. In view of the settlement between the parties, these Criminal Revision cases are dismissed. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 07.08.2026 knl