DINESH CHANDRA AMETA S/O SHRI GIRIJA SHANKAR AMETA, v. SHUBHRA SINGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
CCP/782/2024 · 2026-03-19
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 813 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 813 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11832] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 782/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19561/2023
1. Dinesh Chandra Ameta S/o Shri Girija Shankar Ameta, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Vtc Intali, P.o. Intali, Sub District Mavli, Distt. Udaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Jagdish Chandra Bhandawat S/o Shri Amba Lal Bhandawat, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Gogala, Jhadol, Distt. Udaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Shubhra Singh Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
3. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, The Additional Director (Admn.) Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Medical and Health, Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Yadav on behalf of Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG assisted by Mr. Pulkit Bhardwaj, Asstt. G.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 19/03/2026
1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging non-compliance of order dated 31.01.2024 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19561/2023 (Onkar Mal Jat & Ors. Vs. State of
[2026:RJ-JP:11832] (2 of 2) [CCP-782/2024] Rajasthan & Anr.), whereby directions were given to the respondents to decide the representation filed by the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset, submitted that in compliance of directions given by this Court on 31.01.2024, respondents have decided the representation filed by the petitioners.
3. In view of above, there is no case of deliberate and wilful disobedience on part of the respondents, hence, this contempt petition is dismissed.
4. Notices stand discharged.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/54