Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8121 (PAT)

Om Prakash Singh v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./10326/2026 · 2026-02-26

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10326 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2024 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Om Prakash Singh Son of Digvijay Narain Singh Resident of Village - Rampur Haripur, P.S. - Pupari, District - Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 26-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had a secret information that three bikers are carrying illegal liquor. When the bikers were ordered to stop, bikers started fleeing away. Two persons were apprehended and from these bikers altogether 132 liters of liquor was recovered. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10326 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 2/3 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is framed in this case because he is the owner of one of the bikes. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has handed over his bike to one Amrendra Kumar who has misused the bike and was apprehended at the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 79448 of 2024. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10326 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 3/3 satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-I, Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T