Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8118 (RAJ)

SITARAM S/O LATE SHRI MOOLCHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/8772/2026 · 2026-05-21

Vinod Kumar Bharwani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21582] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8772/2026 1. Sitaram S/o Late Shri Moolchand, Resident Of Village And Post Basai, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt. Kotputli- Behror, (Rajasthan) 2. Suraj Bhan S/o Late Shri Moolchand, Resident Of Village And Post Basai, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt. Kotputli- Behror, (Rajasthan) 3. Sube Singh S/o Late Shri Moolchand, Resident Of Village And Post Basai, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt. Kotputli- Behror, (Rajasthan) 4. Sultan S/o Late Shri Harsahay, Resident Of Village And Post Basai, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt. Kotputli- Behror, (Rajasthan) 5. Dataram S/o Late Shri Harsahay, Resident Of Village And Post Basai, Tehsil Kotputli, Distt. Kotputli- Behror, (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. 3. The Tehsildar-Cum-Managing Officer (Custodian), Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Kishan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG assisted by Mr. Manoj Choudhary, Mr. S.P. Singh Rajawat & Mr. Yadvendra Patel HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 21/05/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:21582] (2 of 3) [CW-8772/2026] 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking a direction to enter the name of the petitioners in Revenue record as per direction given by this court in SBCWP No.1878/1982 [Ishwar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 30.03.1993. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that this Court has subsequently also directed the authority to pass appropriate orders in respect of conferment of right of entries in the Revenue record, and as such Counsel refers the order passed by this Court in SBCWP No. 2801/2007 [Sadhu Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 05.08.2008. 3. Learned counsel has further referred the orders passed by this Court in SBCWP No.13958/2009 [Heeralal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] decided on 17.11.2009, SBCWP No.14794/2016 [Leela Ram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.] and other connected writ petitions decided by a common order dt.25.10.2017 and SBCWP No.6619/2015 [Kailash & Ors. Vs.State of Rajasthan & Ors.] on 19.11.2015. 4. This Court finds that earlier writ petitions decided by this Court has permitted the persons to approach the respondents and they were to submit a fresh application and then the authorities were required to decide such representations by keeping in mind the order passed in the case of Ishwar & Ors. (supra) 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents does not dispute the aforesaid legal position and submits that the petitioners are required to approach the authorities again by submitting fresh application. [2026:RJ-JP:21582] (3 of 3) [CW-8772/2026] 6. Heard. Perused. 7. Looking to the overall facts & circumstances of the case and considering the submissions made at bar, the present writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the petitioners to approach the respondents by filing a fresh application for conferment of their right and the respondents are directed to decide the said representation/s in accordance with law. 8. In case, the petitioners file representation/s within a period of two weeks, the same may be decided by the respondents in expeditious manner but in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation/s. 9. Stay applications and all application(s) (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH/ 20