Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8117 (GAU)

THE KACHARI TRIBAL COUNCIL, NAGALAND (KTCN) v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/128/2026 · 2026-06-15

Nelson Sailo

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020004162026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/128/2026 THE KACHARI TRIBAL COUNCIL, NAGALAND (KTCN) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PURANA BAZAAR, DISTRICT - DIMAPUR, NAGALAND. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, MR. C.K. MECH. S/O LATE DWARIKANATH MACH R/O HOUSE NO. 816, MIDDLE COLONY, PURANA BAZAAR, DIMAPUR, NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA, NAGALAND 2:THE HOME COMMISSIONER GOVT. OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 3:THE COMMISSIONER NAGALAND GOVT. OF NAGALAND KOHIMA NAGALAND 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIMAPUR NAGALAND 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHUMUKEDIMA NAGALAND 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER PEREN NAGALAND Advocate for the Petitioner : JOSHUA SHEQI, A HUKAVI SUMI,RUBICA KIHO,TUNATO YEPTHO,R WONCHIBENI TSANGLO,KIVITOLI SWU,YEKA SUMI,KEVI KIRE,K LILY SWU,KEDI KOSO,P MHONBENI EZUNG,MIKA H Page No.# 2/2 AYE,CHINGMEI KONYAK,NAGALI SHOHE Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER Date : 16-06-2026 Mr. Joshua Sheqi, learned counsel for the applicant submits that by filing this application, the applicant who is arrayed as petitioner No.3 in the main writ petition wishes to withdraw from the writ petition and therefore prays that the name of the petitioner No.3 be struck off from the arrayed petitioners. The learned counsel submits that withdrawal of the petitioner No.3 would not prejudice the case of any of the parties. Mr. Imti Imsong, learned Addl. A.G appearing for the State respondents and Ms. Esther, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners in the writ petition submits that they have no objection to the prayer made by the applicant. Accordingly, the applicant who is the writ petitioner No.3 in the main writ petition is allowed to withdraw from the writ petition as prayed for. I.A is disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant