1 2026:CGHC:14346 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 723 of 2025 1 - Nemichand Makhija S/o Parmanand Makhija Aged About 56 Years (Wrongly Mentioned As 50 Years In Cause Title Of Writ Petition) R/o Gokul Nivas, Nearby Jhulelal Mandir Iedgahbhata Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Opposite Laxmi Talkies Gandhi Chowk Main Road Juna Bilaspur Tahsil And District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh- Wrongly Mentioned In Cause Title Of The Writ Petition). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Hariballabh Agrawal S/o Ramdayal Agrawal President Chhattisgarh Navyuvak Sangh R/o 323 - A - Sundar Nagar Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh Grih Nirman Mandal Raipur, Through Its Competent Officer/ Estate Officer, Chhattisgarh Grih Nirman Mandal Shankar Nagar Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Collector Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Additional Collector Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Board Of Revenue Chhattisgarh, Through Its Registrar, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner/s : Shri Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Pallav Mishra, Advocate. For Respondents/ State : Shri Anil S. Pandey, G.A. NIRMALA RAO 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25 .03.2026 1. This is an application for restoration of W.P.(227) No.402 of 2020. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit on 15.4.2025, due to unavoidable circumstances, no one could appear when the matter was taken up for hearing. He would submit that the petitioner is interested in prosecuting the case. He would pray to allow this application. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents would oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for parties and perused the documents available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and the reasons assigned in the application, the application for restoration is allowed and WP(227) No.402 of 2020 is restored to its original number subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- payable to High Court Bar Library Fund. 6. With the aforesaid observations, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi