Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
UKHC010163342019
2026:UHC:5849 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS/3100/2019
Devesh Nautiyal --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel appearing for petitioner makes statement at the Bar that writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
3. In view of the statement made by
learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 15.07.2026 Mahinder/