Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8114 (UTT)

DEVESH NAUTIYAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3100/2019 · 2026-07-15

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010163342019 2026:UHC:5849 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/3100/2019 Devesh Nautiyal --Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel appearing for petitioner makes statement at the Bar that writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 15.07.2026 Mahinder/