Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8112 (UTT)

PARSHANT CHAUDHARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/443/2026 · 2026-07-15

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010122612026 2026:UHC:5824-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 15th July, 2026 WRIT PETITION (S/B) NO. 443 of 2026 Parshant Chaudhari ------Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ----Respondents Presence:- Mr. Mukesh Kumar Kaparuwan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned Additional CSC with Mr. Gajendra Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.) 1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:- “(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Government Order/Structure (+Bkapk) bearing Government Order No.86/XVIIA- 01/2026-24(04)/2008 (E-41790) dated 11.02.2026, issued by the State Government. (Contained as Annexure No.3 and Page No.39 to 48 to this writ petition). II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the transfer order dated 30.06.2026, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Government Ashram Type Higher Might Secondary School, Bidora, District Udham Singh Nagar to Government Ashram Type Higher Secondary School, Munsiyari District Pithoragarh. (Contained as Annexure No.4 and Page No.49 to 51 this writ petition). III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the relieving order dated 02.07.2026, issued pursuant to the transfer order dated 30.06.2026. (Contained as Annexure No.5 and Page No. 52 to this writ petition).” 1 UKHC010122612026 2026:UHC:5824-DB 2. Learned State Counsel points out that in WPSB Nos.439 & 440 of 2026, the same Government Order as well as the order of transfer of persons working as Chief Administrative Officer, were under challenge and the writ petition has been dismissed on 14.07.2026. He submits that the controversy is concluded by the said order, which could not be disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of it and for the reasons given in the said order, the present writ petition is also dismissed. 4. Pending application, if any, also stand(s) disposed of. (MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 15.07.2026 KKS/PP 2