Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8112 (ALL)

SADANAND GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/37352/2026 · 2026-09-16

Ajit Kumar, Siddharth Nandan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 37352 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. Petitioner is aggrieved by the act and conduct of the respondents in interfering in peaceful possession of the petitioner and also respondents are restraining the petitioner from raising construction over and above the land in respect of which petitioner has already enjoying a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction. In our considered view, if petitioner is aggrieved for non compliance of the injunction decree, he should get the injunction decree executed in accordance with law. Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. September 17, 2026 Atmesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheeraj Kumar Yadav, Jagadamba Gupta, Naveen Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Siddharth Nandan,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Sadanand Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ATMESH KESARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad