Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8111 (ALL)

RAKESH KUMAR GARG v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND 2 OTHERS

A227/4347/2015 · 2026-09-17

Y K Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4347 of 2015 Court No. - 35 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Present petition has been listed under the heading 'cases likely to be infructuous'. Office report dated 14.7.2026 indicates that the proceedings before the trial Court out of which present petition has arisen have been concluded and in view thereof, the petition has become infructuous. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. It is, however, observed that in the event any cause of action still survives, it shall be open to the party concerned to move an appropriate application seeking recall of this order. Sri Alok Tripathi, holding brief of Dr H N Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3 is present. September 18, 2026 RKK/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Tiwari, Pankaj Govil, Punit Khare Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dr. Hari Nath Tripathi, Durga Tiwari (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Rakesh Kumar Garg .....Petitioner(s) Additional District Judge And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR KANNAUJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad