BURHANA BEGUM MAZARBHUYAN AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS
WP(C)/7442/2025 · 2026-06-14
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8110 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8110 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010281982025
2026:GAU-AS:8561
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7442/2025 BURHANA BEGUM MAZARBHUYAN AND ANR W/O NAZRUL ISLAM BARBHUYAN, VILLAGE- UJANKAPA PT-III, P.S. AND DIST- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM 2: . YASMIN BEGAM BORBHUYAN WIFE OF SAHID AHMED MAZAMDAR VILLAGE - GANGPAR DHUMKARPT- III P.O.- GANGPAR DHUMKAR P.S.- HAILAKANDI PIN -788155 HAILAKANDI ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, ASSAM.
2:THE DEPUTY SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 ASSAM 3:THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ASSAM JURIPAR PANJABARI GUWAHATI-22 ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 4:THE JOINT DIRECTOR FINANCE (ECONOMIC AFFAIRS) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
5:THE JOINT DIRECTOR O/O THE COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ASSAM JURIPAR PANJABARI GUWAHATI-22 ASSAM 6:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM 7:THE HAILAKANDI GAON PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT P.O- AND P.S- HAILAKANDI DIST- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788155 8:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ALGAPUR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK 9:THE HAILAKANDI GAON PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. P.O- AND P.S- HAILAKANDI DIST- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788155 10:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER HAILAKANDI ZILLA PARISHAD HAILAKANDI P.O AND P.S- HAILAKANDI DIST- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-78815 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.J. Sarmah, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : None appears
BEFORE
Page No.# 3/3 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER Date : 15.06.2026
Mr. S. J. Sarmah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition.
2. Taking into account the said submission, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant