Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8110 (BOM)

DEEPLAXMI NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA LTD. v. VAISHALI ARUN REBINAL AND ORS.

CRA/92/2026 · 2026-09-10

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30-CRA-92-2026 (C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 92 OF 2026 Deeplaxmi Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Ltd. … Applicant Versus Mrs. Vaishali Arun Rebinal And Ors. … Respondents —————— Mr. Pradeep D. Dalvi a/w. Mr. Tejas Shelake & Ms. Sonal Nalawade for the Applicant. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 10th September 2026. PER COURT : 1. By the present Revision Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantive relief: “A] The impugned judgement and order dated 27-4-2026 passed by 7th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara passed below Exh. 20 in Regular Civil Suit No. 68 of 2026 be quashed and set aside and application below Exh. 20 may be allowed.” 2. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Pradeep Dalvi, learned advocate for the Applicant, sought a pass over to take instructions. At osk 1 of 2 30-CRA-92-2026 (C).docx his request, after some time, this Application was taken up. 3. Mr. Pradeep Dalvi, learned advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Revision Application with liberty to raise all the contentions on law as well as on merits of the case before the Trial Court. 4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Pradeep Dalvi, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the Revision Application. 5. All the contentions of the Applicant on merits of the case are left open for consideration by the Trial Court while adjudicating the suit. 6. Civil Revision Application No. 92 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 2 of 2 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2026.09.10 20:54:56 +0530