Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8109 (PNJ)

RAM KUMAR v. MOHIT SINGLA

CR/6112/2023 · 2026-01-29

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[127] Ram Kuma Mohit Sing Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] petitioner s petition in demised pr opposed by [2] dismissed [3] disposed of 29.01.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA CR-6112- Date of De Kumar versus it Singla HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Navmohit Singh, Advocat Mr. Vishal Garg, Advocate for **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) After arguing for some tim ioner submits that he has instructions n in case the petitioner is granted sed premises. He prays for 06 months sed by Mr. Garg, counsel for the landl In view of the above, the issed, subject to the following conditio i) that the petitioner shall the demised premises to the re 31.07.2026. ii) that he shall clear the 28.02.2026 and shall keep on at the agreed date on or before iii) Petitioner shall file und this Court before 28.02.2026. All pending miscellaneous a ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH -2023 (O&M) of Decision : 29.01.2026 …Petitioner ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN vocate for the petitioner. for the respondent. e time, learned counsel for the tions not to press the present revision ranted sufficient time to vacate the onths time. The said proposal is not landlord. e, the present revision petition is onditions:- shall hand over vacant possession of the respondent-landlord on or before ar the entire arrears of rent by ep on paying monthly rent regularly before 10th day of each month. le undertaking in this respect before 2026. eous application(s), if any, stands (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No r the vision te the is not on is ion of efore nt by ularly efore tands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.01.30 16:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document