Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040008872026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/45/2026 Techi Topu Tara and Anr Son of Late Techi Teyi, resident of Village Khemlee. PO and PS Sagalee, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Smti Nabam Shanti Techi Age: Occupation : Wife of Techi Topu Tara resident of Village Khemlee PO and SP Sagalee Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Techi Ita Tara, Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP,
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER 16.06.2026 Heard Mr. T. Ita Tara, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
2. This application has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking correction of the particulars appearing on page No. 2 of the main petition, being Crl. Petn. No. 146(AP)/2026.
3. Mr. Tara, learned counsel for the applicants, submits that due to an inadvertent typographical error, the cause title on page No. 2 of Crl. Petn. No. 146(AP)/2026 reflects the relief as "For issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus or Certiorari" instead of "Issue notice and call for the criminal case records." He, therefore, prays for correction of the said error.
4. The prayer, not being objected to by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, is allowed.
5. In view of the above, the applicants are permitted to do the necessary correction and are granted 2 (two) days' time to amend the cause title.
6. In terms of the above, this interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant