HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22538 of 2026 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE DR. AJAY KUMAR-II, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. Even though the names of Mr. Dewendra Singh and Mr. Vivek Upadhyay are duly published in the cause list as counsel for petitioner but neither they nor anyone on their behalf is present to press this writ petition even in revised call. 3. Learned A.G.A. representing State-respondents 1, 2 and 3 is present. 4. Petitioner-Dinesh Chandra has approached this Court by means of present Criminal Misc. Writ Petition for a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 2 and 3 to conduct fair and impartial investigation of Case Crime No. 130 of 2026, under Sections 191 (2), 191 (3), 190, 110, 351 (2) BNS, Police Station-Fariha, District-Firozabad arising out of F.I.R. dated 10.07.2026, expeditiously preferably within a time bound period. 5. On the matter being taken up, the learned A.G.A. representing State/respondents 1, 2 and 3 submits that during pendency of present writ petition, Investigating Officer upon completion of statutory investigation of aforementioned case crime number in terms of Chapter XIII BNSS, has forwarded the police report dated 23.08.2026 in terms of Section 193 (3) BNSS. On the above premise, it is thus urged by the learned A.G.A. that no cause of action now survives with petitioner to press this writ petition any further. As such, present writ petition is liable to be dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 5. When confronted with above, the learned counsel for petitioner could not over come the same. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dewendra Singh, Vivek Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Dinesh Chandra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. Having heard the learned A.G.A. for State/respondents 1, 2 and 3 and upon perusal of record, we find that in view of the objection raised by the learned A.G.A. in opposition to this writ petition as noted herein above, no cause of action now survives with petitioner to maintain the writ petition any further. 7. As a result, present writ petition fails and is liable to be dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 8. It is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous. 9. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. September 18, 2026 YK CRLP No. 22538 of 2026 2 (Dr. Ajay Kumar-II,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.) Digitally signed by :- YASHWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad