Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 81047 (MAD)

ANGAMMAL v. The Tahsildhar

WP/3152/2026 · 2026-02-04

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 3152 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 3152 of 2026 Angammal ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildhar O/o.of the Tahsildar, Chinna salem Town and Taluk Kallakurichi District-606 201 2. The Revenue Inspector O/o.of the Tahsildar Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi District 3. Periyasamy 4. Ramalingam 5. Selvakumar ..Respondent(s) directing the respondents herein to consider and pass orders on the petitioners representation/objection dated 22.9.2025 seeking issuance of proper notice to all interested parties and consideration of the petitioner’s objections https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3152 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 before conducting the survey of the land in survey No.302/11 of Koogaiyur Village, Chinna salem Taluk, Kallakurichi District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Praveen For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP For R1 & R2 R3 to R5-N D/w-PVT Order This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the official respondents to consider the petitioner's representation/objection dated 22.09.2025 before conducting the survey and demarcation of the land, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.Based on the request made by the private respondents, the official respondents are in the process of conducting survey and demarcation of the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner claims that she has right over the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. She has raised objection to the official respondent through her representation/objection dated 22.09.2025 with regard to the survey and demarcation of the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner apprehends that her objections may not be considered before conducting survey and demarcation of the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3152 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 to this writ petition. Necessarily, the objection of the petitioner as raised in the petitioner's representation dated 22.09.2025 has to be considered by the official respondents before conducting survey and demarcation of the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the request made by the private respondents for survey and demarcation of boundaries of the property. 3.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. Since no adverse order is being passed against the respondents 3 to 5, notice to the respondents 3 to 5 is dispensed with. 4.For the forgoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the official respondents to consider and pass final orders on the petitioner's representation/objection dated 22.09.2025 submitted by the petitioner, before conducting survey and demarcation of the boundaries of the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the request made by the respondents 3 to 5 seeking for survey and demarcation of boundaries, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 04-02-2026 VGA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3152 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA To 1. The Tahsildhar O/o.of the Tahsildar, Chinna salem Town and Taluk Kallakurichi District-606 201 2. The Revenue Inspector O/o.of the Tahsildar Chinnasalem Taluk, Kallakurichi District WP No. 3152 of 2026 04-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis