- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13853 RP No. 406 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO. 406 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. JANNAPURA DEVALAYAGAL SAMITHI, A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SREE MALLESWARA DEVASTHANA, MALLESWARA CIRCLE, JANNAPURA, BHADRAVATHI - 577 301. REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT J V VIRUPAKSHAIAH, S/O LATE J P VEERABHADRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, SECRETARY, M B PARASHURAMA, S/O MANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VARADARAJ RANGANATHA RAO HAVALDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SREE MARIYAMMAN DEVASTHANAM, A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT VELLORE-SHED, JANNAPURA, BHADRAVETHI - 577 301. REP BY ITS PRESIDENT, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13853 RP No. 406 of 2025 K KANNAPPA, S/O LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, R/O RAJAPPA LAYOUT, JANNAPURA BHADRAVATHI - 577 301. 2. THE CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, BHADRAVATHI, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SEC. 114 of CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 13.08.2025 PASSED IN RSA NO.407/2017(INJ), INCLUDING DECREEING OF THE SUIT OF THE PETITIONER/ PLAINTIFF IN OS NO. 127/2011 AS PRAYED FOR IN THE PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER This Review Petition is filed, seeking the review of judgment and decree dated 13.08.2025 in RSA.No.407/2017. 2. Sri.Varadaraj Ranganatha Rao Havaldar, learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner submitted that pursuant to the disposal of the RSA.No.407/2017, the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13853 RP No. 406 of 2025 parties have entered into an agreement and the same has been considered. 3. However, by looking into the scope and amendment of Section 114 of CPC, I am of the view that, such an arrangement between the parties, subsequent to the passing of the judgment and decree, cannot be accepted. 4. Therefore, as there is no error apparent on the face of the record in the order dated 13.08.2025 in RSA No.407/2017, I am not inclined to entertain this Review Petition. Accordingly, the Review petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35