Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 81 (UTT)

ARMAN ANSARI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/188/2026 · 2026-03-17

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA 1st No.188 of 2026 Arman Ansari Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Pradeep Chamyal, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. In the High Court of Uttarakhand, the present case arises from Bail Application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail for the Applicant – Arman Ansari, who has been accused in FIR No.0288 of 2025, under Sections 8/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, at Police Station Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar. 4. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has falsely been implicated in the matter. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant has made out a case for bail. 6. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. It is directed that the Applicant - Arman Ansari, who has been accused in FIR No.0288 of 2025, under Sections 8/22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, at Police Station Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court. The Applicant shall cooperate with the trial proceedings and shall not misuse the liberty granted to him. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 17.03.2026 Nitesh/