MANAKSIA ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS.
MC(WPC)/113/2026 · 2026-04-07
H S Thangkhiew
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 81 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 81 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
Serial No.09 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
MC[WP(C)]. No. 113 of 2026 in WP(C). No. 564 of 2025 (disposed of)
Date of Decision: 07.04.2026
Manaksia Aluminium Company Limited, Represented by Mr. Anand Kumar Chaudhary, 8/1, Lal Bazar Street, Bikamer Building, Third Floor, Kolkata – 700001.
…Applicant
-Versus-
1. The State of Meghalaya, represented by the Chief Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. The Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Housing Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
3. The Director, Directorate of Housing, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong-793001.
4. M/s. Power Roofing, Umtru Road Village Amjok, Byrnihat, Ri-Bhoi – 793122.
5. M/s. Meghalaya Roofing, Industrial Area, Umiam, Meghalaya-793103.
6. M/s. Mariem Commerce Limited, Umbir, Ri-Bhoi – 793101.
…Respondents 2026:MLHC:303
2
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. R.Pahsyntiew, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. N.D.Chullai, AAG with
Ms.Z.E.Nongkynrih,GA for R 1-3.
Mr. M.L.Nongpiur, Adv. for R 4.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Heard Mr. R.Pahsyntiew, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. This misc. application has been filed for modification of the order dated 18-03-2026, passed in WP(C). No. 564 of 2025. The prayer of the applicant is to incorporate a specific direction that any supply of aluminium roofing sheets beyond the original tender value of ₹69,65,00,000.00/- (Rupees sixty-nine crore sixty-five lakh) only, must be initiated through a fresh tender process, and to specify that Clause 17 of the NIQ dated 10-09- 2024, shall not be utilized for the purpose of issuing repeat orders beyond the original scope of the tender. 2026:MLHC:303
3
3. It is noted that in the main case itself, the writ petitioner was an unsuccessful bidder in the tender process which was initiated by the NIQ dated 10-09-2024. As the matter has since attained finality with the direction of the Division Bench, this misc. application is not considered and is accordingly disposed of.
Judge
2026:MLHC:303 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.04.08 11:48:37 IST