TARLOK CHAND v. ACHAL SETHI, LAW SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF LAW CIVIL DECRETARIAT AND OTHERS
CCP(D)/3/2026 · 2026-04-01
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 81 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 81 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 07
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP (D) No. 3/2026 in WP (C) N o. 608/2023
Tarlok Chand
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None
V/s
Achal Sethi, Law Secretary Department of Law Civil Secretariat and others …..Respondent(s)
Through:- None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 01.04.2026
1. None for the petitioner. On the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, even steps for service of respondents have not been taken. It seems that the petitioner does not have any subsisting grievance against the compliance of the judgment dated 24.12.2024 passed by this Court.
2. This contempt petition is, therefore, closed.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
JUDGE Jammu: 01.04.2026 Shafqat