Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 80995 (MAD)

PERIYAMMAL v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/2954/2026 · 2026-02-04

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 2954 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 2954 of 2026 Periyammal ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Collector office, Salem district, Fort Man road, Salem 636 001 2. Revenue Divisional officer Sankagiri Taluk, Sankagiri salem district 3. The Tahsildar Sankagiri Taluk, 15 Sankagiri Thiruchengode Road, Salem district 637 301 ..Respondent(s) directing the respondents to issue patta for the Gramanatham Land situated at Sankagiri Village and Taluk and Salem district comprised in Survey Nos. 170/11and 170/12 which is in petitioners occupation. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Muthusamy For Respondent(s): Mr.D.Ravichander,SGP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2954 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Order This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to issue patta in the name of the petitioner for the Gramanatham land, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.The petitioner had given a representation on 12.08.2024 to the respondents seeking for issuance of gramanatham patta for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. Along with the representation, the petitioner had also filed supporting documents. Since the representation has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3.Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation seeking for issuance of gramanatham patta for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners or any other third party, if any, whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2954 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation seeking for issuance of patta. 6.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the first respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's representation dated 12.08.2024 seeking for issuance of gramanatham patta for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners or any other third party, if any, whom the first respondent deems it fit to enquire, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 04-02-2026 VGA To 1. The District Collector Collector office, Salem district, Fort Man road, Salem 636 001 2. Revenue Divisional officer Sankagiri Taluk, Sankagiri Salem district 3. The Tahsildar Sankagiri Taluk, 15 Sankagiri Thiruchengode Road, Salem district 637 301 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 2954 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA WP No. 2954 of 2026 04-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis