Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13.04.2026 Court No.35.
D/L. 24. Kausik (Rejected)
CRM (NDPS) 617 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Kaliyaganj Police Station Case No. 355 of 2025 dated 30.08.2025 under section 22(c) of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Rajesh Saha @ Bangru
……Petitioner.
Mr. Amit Roy
Mr. Anish Tiwari
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Joydeep Roy Ms. Debolina Das
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that there are 4 antecedents of the present petitioner. There was recovery of 50 bottles of Phensedyl from the present petitioner only. According to the learned advocate for the petitioner, one of the seizure list witnesses have been examined.
Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the examination of the other seizure list witnesses. If, after the evidence of the seizure list witnesses, the learned Trial Court feels that the prosecution case, so far as the factum of seizure is concerned, it is diluted, it would be the discretion of the
2 learned Trial Court to consider the application for bail of the petitioner in a lenient manner.
At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (NDPS) 617 of 2026 is dismissed.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)